Bzz (seraphempyre) wrote in post_modernism,

Masculist rant against feminazism

Ah, I feel in the mood for a rant.

Feminazis. You know, the types that are all for feminism, meaning, in their view on things: The support and advancement of women, but, in the mean time, the degradation of men.

The type that denies that women are limited to stereotypical roles, but that generalize all men in the same category. The one that says women, or more specifically they themselves, are great, because they are a woman, but assert that all men are weak, inattentive, crude, sexist, unreliable, etc., ie inferior bastards.

Yes, sometimes they are joking. But it´s often not that ironically meant, ironically.

If only it got through their thick skulls.

Women and their logic. Oh, right... they don´t have logic... ;)

Also, what is feminism when the women take on all the supposed negative traits of men and actually start imitating/emulating men. Isn´t feminism about being proud of being a woman and not considering one sex as inferior to the other? Be proud of differences, even if you deviate from being different. Be proud of yourselves. Or do I really have a skewed sense of feminism and is it actually that bad a movement?

If you support women, but at the same time degrade men, you have no sense what was the original motivation and essence of feminism or the equality movement.

Seraphempyre, post-feminist masculist. ;)

PS: And remember, I always like this argument, we men let you women gain power: We had the (physical) strength, the weapons, the (political) positions, etc. But we let you women gain advantage. So, be fucking grateful instead of being ingrates. ;)

(X-posted in a few communities and my own journal.)
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.